An Open Letter to John Ziegler


Dear Mr. Ziegler,

We all want the truth, John. We really do. I want the truth. You want the truth. The Paternos want the truth. My fellow students want the truth. Your followers want the truth. Your haters want the truth. Everyone wants the truth.

Alas, you already knew that. You injected yourself into this mess early on and waged a year-long media crusade that featured animated YouTube videos, dozens of radio appearances, and even interviews with Jerry Sandusky himself. Consequently, this campaign to exonerate Joe Paterno built you a solid following along the way — a following that essentially propelled you to appearances on primetime TV as of late.

But this week, the wheels fell off. The Paternos, the family of the man who you have strived so hard to defend over the past year, rapidly (and intelligently) distanced themselves from you during the last 72 hours, beginning on Sunday night. Next came the Today Show interview and the shouting match with Piers Morgan on Monday, which, in all honesty, I wasn’t overly irked by.

But then you crossed the line yesterday when you released the statement that essentially blackmailed Victim 2 into speaking with you (which I hope he didn’t respond to). Sixteen months into this scandal and you’re threatening victims into talking — how civil of you. If victim shaming is the price of the truth, I honestly don’t know if I want the truth anymore. Do you understand how deranged that is?

But no, John, you did not stop there. That wasn’t enough — you had to resort to the unthinkable. Around 7 p.m. last night, you inexplicably published Victim 2’s name multiple times in your attempt to exonerate the man whose family virtually disowned you. Let me reiterate that: You published the identity of a sexual abuse victim in an attempt to defend Joe Paterno. I’m sure that’s what he would’ve wanted.

And wait, it gets EVEN better. Around 8:30 p.m., you denied (and potentially lied about) intentions of naming the victim and blamed it on “cyber attacks.” Additionally, about an hour later, you tweeted that the problems were fixed. Yet, I refreshed the page and there the name was, staring at me in the face for a second straight hour. Then finally — it’s now 11:00 p.m. — you apologize for “a stupid mistake out of utter exhaustion” and state that the “hacking prevented us from fixing.”

Well, John, even if I were to believe this was unintentional, “exhaustion” is not a justifiable excuse. Period. Perhaps if you cared as much about the respect and sensitivity of the victims as much as you did about the fight for Paterno, this wouldn’t have happened. Your post even had the chance to be enlightening. But the harm done in publishing Victim 2’s name far outweighs any revelations contained in your piece.

During your failed backpedal, one tweet states that the hacking “prevented” you from fixing the post — that’s past tense. It’s now three hours after that tweet… I just refreshed the page… The name is still staring me in the face, John. So, if the alleged “hacking” concluded hours ago, why is the name still up? (The names were finally removed around 3 a.m. EST Wednesday morning, eight hours after the initial post went live.)

It’s crystal clear, John: You wanted this to happen, or at the very least, you didn’t care if it did. You (intentionally or not) went through with your sick, sadistic threat even though experts such as Jim Clemente strongly advised you not to do so. You’ve succeeded. You’ve now made it that much harder for past, present, and future sexual abuse victims to come forward and seek help. Mission accomplished. I hope you’re happy.

Everything you have achieved up to this point, any residual positives from your work, has now quickly evaporated due to your recent insane, conniving, and downright reckless methods.

While many people are still divided on whether Penn State should “move on” or not, everyone in this community is unified in trying to make something good out of this mess — to help this community and the victims heal. Your actions blatantly disregarded these efforts and served as an insult to those who are working to make this university a worldwide role model in child sexual abuse awareness and prevention.

I truly believe this all started a year ago with positive goals in mind, but somewhere over the last month, those goals have drastically changed for the worse. You are no longer informative and an effective seeker of “truth”. You are vicious, irresponsible, and an embarrassment to anyone associated with this school and the man you claim to fight for.

Let me make it very clear once more: You are hurting Penn State. You are hurting victims of sexual abuse. You are inflicting much more harm than good on the situation as a whole.

We want you to get the fuck out of here, John. You have officially overstayed your welcome.

And that’s the damn truth.


9 thoughts on “An Open Letter to John Ziegler

  1. Scott Ellwood Phillips says:

    I guess it time to raise the black flag and start slitting throats.

    ” insane, conniving, and downright reckless”? Really? ” You are vicious, irresponsible, and an embarrassment to anyone associated with this school”? Are you sure that’s true?

    John’s work to date, shows he is one of the very few people who want to find the truth without pandering, posturing or serving some hidden purpose.I will take John at his word, that he didn’t intend to release the name of the person who signed his name to the letter to the editor. He has given me no reason not to. Nor has he given you any reason not to. Until that happens, I will take him at his word.

    Now, just so we are clear Ryan, I went to Penn State, I am very proud of Penn State, and I am sick to death of people, like you, that seem to think their opinions are the only ones. You don’t know me, we’ve never met, and hopefully never will. How is it you presume to speak for me?

    I am not embarrassed by John. I am grateful for John. I hope that he continues to seek the truth, as will I.

    So Ryan, just to be crystal clear, Fuck You. Get up on your soap box and scream you hearts desire, but don’t ever pretend to speak for me. I can speak for myself, I don’t need you.

  2. Roxine says:


    Thank you for your help last night trying to reason with Mr. Ziegler. And thank you for speaking out on behalf of this young man. Disclosing childhood sexual abuse is difficult and all victims should be allowed to control the narrative of their lives. So much has already been taken from them, they are entitled to and deserve our respect with regards to their privacy.

    Roxine Behrens

  3. Chuck says:

    Do you realize that the state of Pennsylvania publicized the names of *all* the victims in the Sandusky trial transcripts? Anybody at the click of a mouse can go to the Centre County PA website and find the names of each victim.

    Victim 2 made himself public in a letter to the editor, which is available (in non-redacted form, might I add) on places other than Ziegler’s website. He initially defended Sandusky, and was even going to be a witness for Sandusky’s defense, but reversed his position because (a) his arm was twisted by a lawyer who convinced him that whatever Sandusky did to him that evening would’ve been considered abusive, and (b) he recognized that Penn State was offering free money to purported Sandusky victims. Had he actually testified at Sandusky’s trial, more counts probably would have been dropped and thus the alleged culpability of Penn State would’ve disappeared. That the prosecution didn’t call him as a witness is a *not* a coincidence.

    Victim 2 should’ve done the right thing, and he didn’t.

  4. bigd88 says:

    I’m going to agree with Scott Elwood Phillips and Chuck here. (minus the cursing you out part, Ryan)
    I was 90% sure who Victim 2 was before Ziegler ever published his findings – and that was with simple research. Victim 2’s name is out in the public based on his own accord and previous pieces of writing related to the Sandusky matter.
    And quite frankly, Ziegler has proven to be much more genuine than any other “journalist,” or “reporter” (including those on this very site) on both sides of this issue since the very beginning. So while I think that maybe for his own sake that Ziegler should take a week off, kick back some cold beers and just relax for a week for his own well-being, I absolutely am not telling him to piss off.
    Let us not act so sanctimonious, lest we begin to resemble the ignorant masses that condemn us for simply being Penn Staters.

    • Ryan Beckler says:

      A “journalist” doesn’t publish a name of a victim until they’re ready to come forward. I don’t care if it was a mistake or not. If that’s my post, it’s getting proofed 100 times.
      However, I do appreciate your comment. It was one of the more articulate remarks I’ve seen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s